May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Improper 290.3 fine imposed

People v. Valenzuela (2009) , Cal.App.4th Second Dist. Apr. 7, 2009
Only issue is whether $300 290.3 fine is appropriate.  It wasn’t.  Whoopie.

Continue reading Improper 290.3 fine imposed

Aider/Abbettor relative liability may be greater or lesser - CALCRIM 400 is confusing

People v. Samaniego (2009) , Cal.App.4th  Second Dist., Apr. 6, 2009
Affirms aider abbettor can be guilty of greater OR lesser crime than actual shooter and CALCRIM 400 is suspect. 3 LA gangbangers and tweakers convicted of multiple murder and gang enhancements and get LWOP.  No eyewitneses to shooting and unable to say which specific Def is killer.  CALCRIM 400 aider / abettor instruction is given.   This failed to address mental states of aider/abbettor.  No objection made and failure to object is deemed as forfeit. Of course its still harmless error.  Discusses McCoy - which states aider can be guilty of greater or lesser crime than the actor.  But…since jury convicted of mult murder spec circ - they must have found intent on part of aider and therefor error is harmless.   At trial SODDI evidence offered but excluded as marginal, i.e. motive and opportunity and even prior threats not enough here, must also be some circumstantial or direct evidence linking other dude to the crime.

Continue reading Aider/Abbettor relative liability may be greater or lesser - CALCRIM 400 is confusing

Causation broadly interpreted in drunk boat case

People v. Dawson (2009) , Cal.App.4th First Dist. Apr. 2, 2009

Def is drunk boat driver. Drunk Victim jumps off back of boat when Def goes in reverse and victim is killed. Def charged with ‘vessel manslaughter’. No holding order at PX is appealed by People. Court reverses and remands saying magistrate incorrectly analyzed causation issues. Narrow view is since drunk victim is dangerously close to rear of boat, Def captain was negligent in backing up with victim in that location, and since this is PX - should get past holding order.

Continue reading Causation broadly interpreted in drunk boat case

Appointed federal counsel may represent client in state clemency proceedings

 HARBISON v. BELL, WARDEN, U.S. Supreme Ct., April 1, 2009

Appointed federal counsel on the habeas in this Tennessee DP case wants to do State clemency proceedings after State court refuses to appoint state counsel on those proceedings. Federal court denies request to expand federal counsel role to clemency proceedings.  US Supremes say she should be appointed. Continue reading Appointed federal counsel may represent client in state clemency proceedings

No US constitutional right to juror premptory challenge-improper denial is harmless error

RIVERA v. ILLINOIS, US Supremes, Illinois No. 07-9995,  March 31, 2009

Def convicted of 1st Deg murder in Illinois.  He exercises premptory against woman, after 2 previous women challenges.  Does not overcome Batson challenge - i.e. no independent basis for challenge in the record and Batson challenge allowed.  Also, no other basis for challenge for cause as to her or any other seated juror.   Court denial of premptory on Batson was wrong, however this is harmless error, and not structural inasmuch as there is no constitutional basis for anything other challenges for cause, not premptory.  Moreover, Court says making good faith judge error reversible would tend to discourage vigorous enforcement of Batson challenges.

Continue reading No US constitutional right to juror premptory challenge-improper denial is harmless error

All underlying assaultive crimes merge with murder and cannot be basis of 2d deg Fel Murder

People v. Chun (2009) , Cal.4th  Cal Supremes Mar. 30, 2009
16 yr old Def is driving around with his home boys, sitting in the back seat.  A shooting war ensues with another car and one of the other guys dies.  Def is tried as adult for special circ murder.  Jury is instructed on 2d deg felony murder and not on 2d deg malice murder.  Def is convicted of 2d deg murder. Appeal ct finds 2 errors - 2d deg fel murder theory was based on assaultive behavior (shooting at car) which merges with murder.  Therefore instruction is error and appeal court says reversible.  Other error is admission of 2d statement based on false promise of leniency (not part of this opinion).  Supremes extend rules on merger doctrine and agree 2d deg fel murder instruction is error.  They say it is harmless since jury would have convicted Def of 2d deg if properly instructed.  Huh? Why bother with instructions.  But, since there was 2d error found by Appeal court, case is remanded so appeal court can take the heat and decide if combination of errors is prejudicial.

Continue reading All underlying assaultive crimes merge with murder and cannot be basis of 2d deg Fel Murder

Gang enhancements stick to gang member selling drugs

People v. Ramirez (2009) , Cal.App.4th Fourth Dist., Div. Three. Mar. 30, 2009.
Def seeks to bifurcate assorted gang enhancements and substantive gang charge from drug sales charges.  Court declines and jury convicts of drug offenses and substantive crime / enchancements that drugs were sold to further gang purposes.  Evidence is based on Def tattoos and gang affiliation but not on proof of actual gang benefit.  Expert says gang would beat the crap out of Def if he does not pay out thier cut and thus thier is an implied gang purpose.  Def gets 25 to life plus 10 for serious felony priors.

Continue reading Gang enhancements stick to gang member selling drugs

Arrest record sealing subject to 2 year limitation period absent basis for delay

People v. Bermudez (2009) , Cal.App.4th First Dist., Div. Five. Mar. 27, 2009

Def seeks determination of to have arrest records sealed under PC 851.8 approx 3 years after dismissal of action.  Def submits multiple letters confirming job denials, and says he didnt know he would have problem and thats why he delayed.  Some of denials were within 2 year limitations period.   If good cause is shown, delay past 2 years can be allowed. Court declines based on 2 yr limitation statute requiring filing within 2 years of arrest or filing of complaint and finds lack of good cause for delay.  Appeals court affirms.

Reasonable doubt does not require explanation - abiding does not equal permanent

People v. Pierce (2009) , Cal.App.4th  Third Dist. Mar. 24, 2009

Only appeal issue here is whether trial court screwed up by cutting off Def in middle of his ‘abiding means permanent’ argument.  DA got to say abiding means you just feel that way now.  So? Court concludes Jurors arent children they know how they feel and they know what’s reasonable.  Especially when they convict someone.

Continue reading Reasonable doubt does not require explanation - abiding does not equal permanent

Stalking conviction based on being creepy rather than credible threat

People v. Uecker (2009) , Cal.App.4th   Third Dist. Mar. 24, 2009

Def convicted of 2 stalking counts with prior strikes gets 50-life.  On appeal he complains of insufficiency of evidence, admission of testimony about prior bad acts and failure to grant Romero.   Although no real threat by Def, he was incredibly creepy, and he was bad before.  Appeal court affirms on all issues.

Continue reading Stalking conviction based on being creepy rather than credible threat