Comments for Law-Guy: Daily Case Summaries

Comment on Prolonged detention allowed on minor traffic offense by Lawguy

Lawguy — Mon, 04 May 2009 14:00:28 +0000

test by mz

Comment on Multiple CALCRIM instructions are upheld by Latisha Scruggs

Latisha Scruggs — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:05:43 +0000

Does the police report have to match the statement made in plimainary hearing?

Comment on Warrantless home entry unlawful when based on smoking pot by broattyErak

broattyErak — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:45:01 +0000

marvellous(special) locality. So to out!

Comment on Wrongful use of access to credit info results in conviction by gregory spooner

gregory spooner — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:57:29 +0000

tillotson’s sentence of fourteen years and four months graphicly illustrates how easily californias determinate sentencing laws can be co-opted by a biased court to alienate the intent of the leglislature. A careful comparison of material entered into evidence in superior court and that which eventually found its way into the hands (and minds) of the appellate court will show factual inconsistancies and egridous mistatements designed to influence the findings of the review court. The “typographical errors” appear to have been incerted with seemingly surgical percision, and set the tone for any subsequent dileration. By placing Commissioner Endquist at the arraignment phase is purposeful misdirection. It supports “Endquist as victom” view employed by prosecution to obviate the need to explain perjurice statements in his {Endquists’) affidavit in support of a restraining order signed by West Court Judge and fellow confident Drake who in fact was the presiding Judge during most of the early proceedings in Tillotsons case. Judge Drake also listened favorably to the perjurous statements of Sgt. Ramsey in his affidavit in support of a restraining order as well. [Drake was forced to step down when his complicity was uncovered.] Another damaging “typo” appears in court records where the word “ounce” is made to replace the far less prejudical word “gram” when speaking of the alledged ammount of drugs proported to have been found at the tillotson residence. The higher court could not have ignored this “neo-fact” when they searched for aggrivating and mitigating factors used by the lower court when it imposed the upper term limit. Because Tillotson’s only other prior was in 1994 and is the abstract used by the rogue prosecution when framing her current case it lacked the necessary “increacing seriousness” that is prerequsite for upper term consideration. The prosecutions attempt to use semantics to eliminate the the third element of the charges of felony identity theft shows their propencity to rewrite not just the law but but also key court documents through their proxies in the court. Don’t make the same mistakes the appellate court did by relying on facts unsupported by reality. It is in the intrest of the law to ensure that the punishment fits the crime. In who’s intrest is it to alter the legal functions of the judiciary to fit the charges?

Comment on Growing indoor pot on your own property does not violate 11366.5 by karljohn » Growing indoor pot on your own property does not violate 11366.5

karljohn » Growing indoor pot on your own property does not violate 11366.5 — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:57:05 +0000

[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here’s a quick excerptPeople v. Dillon (2007) , Cal.App.4th [No. A113310. First Dist., Div. Five. Nov. 8, 2007 Def mailing pot to Chicago brother and getting money mailed back. They are busted and SW reveals grow operation. Def has medical MJ consent and … [...]

Comment on No corpus problem in DUI where engine running and not many others around. Also affirms Black 2. by Dont Let DUI Get You Down » No corpus problem in DUI where engine running and not many others around. Also affirms Black 2.

Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:54:18 +0000

[...] DUI Driving Under the Influence Information wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptNo corpus problem in DUI where engine running and not many others around. Also affirms Black 2. Posted on 2007 under Corpus Delecti, DUI, Sentencing | No Comment 5 Nov People … convicted of DUI and complains about corpus issues. Court finds that corpus is satisfied [...]